Continuing Educational Programs for CRNAs In Costa Rica

Do you want to earn 20 Class A CEUs, learn enough Spanish to communicate with your Spanish-speaking patients and have a “mini vacation” in Costa Rica this winter?

 
 

Southwest Anesthesia and Medical Seminars are each held for 4 days in the mornings, finish by 12:30 PM each day, with the afternoons free, and provide 20 Class A CE credits!

You have the opportunity to enjoy the beauty, natural resources, and recreational activities of Costa Rica while obtaining some of your required CEUs.

Refer to our website and electronic brochure attached for more information and upcoming seminar dates!

Richard M. Saucier, CRNA, MBA
Program Coordinator
AZANA Member since 2011; AANA Member since 1980

Sara Jane Memorial Scholarship

Bold.org has recently launched the $2,000 Sara Jane Memorial Scholarship. They're looking for more applicants and thought Arizona Association of Nurse Anesthetists may have some members who are interested in applying.

For more information about the scholarship, please visit: https://bold.org/scholarships/sara-jane-memorial-scholarship/

High school seniors and undergraduate students are eligible to apply if they are pursuing a career as an RN or LPN and have volunteer experience.

Instructions to Set Up AzLeg.gov Account

Fellow AZANA Members:

We apologize some are having difficulties setting up an account on azleg.gov. We have attached a PDF with screenshots of how to initially set up your account. Once you have done so, email your login credentials to our lobbyists Kelsey Lundy and/or Jessie Armendt at Compass Strategies who will activate your account at the Capitol (contact them no later than Sunday, February 12, 2023).  No further action is needed on your behalf- they will enter you as ‘Against’ HB2457. 

We appreciate your flexibility in this very busy session. We will update you accordingly as things continue to develop. 

Yours in service,

C. Reggie Elam, PhD, DNAP, CRNA
President
Arizona Association of Nurse Anesthesiology

HB2457 Update

AZANA Members:

The countdown has begun!  On Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 0830, HB2457 (licensure of Anesthesiologist Assistants) will be heard in the House Education Committee.  The bill’s sponsor, Representative Pingerelli (R- District 21) is also chair of the House Education Committee

It is imperative everyone register an ‘Against’ vote and contact members of the Education Committee!  If you have not yet registered at azleg.gov for RTS (request to speak), please do so immediately.  Our lobbyists Kelsey Lundy and/or Jessie Armendt at Compass Strategies will activate your account at the Capitol (contact them no later than Sunday, February 12, 2023 with your login credentials).  If you have already registered and have been activated at the Capitol, please make sure you have voted ‘Against’ this legislation.  Instructions for both mobile and desktop applications are attached (RTS Mobile Instructions and RTS Desktop Instructions),.  

In addition to RTS, we encourage you to reach out to members of the House Education Committee directly by email and phone, voicing your opposition to HB2457.  The members of the committee are: 

  1. Representative Beverly Pingerelli, Chair (bpingerelli@azleg.gov(602) 926-3396  

  2. Representative David Marshall, Vice Chair (dmarshall@azleg.gov(602) 926-3579  

  3. Representative David Cook (dcook@azleg.gov(602) 926-5162

  4. Representative Lupe Diaz (ldiaz@azleg.gov(602) 926-4852

  5. Representative Liz Harris (lharris@azleg.gov(602) 926-4153

  6. Representative Michelle Peña (mpena@azleg.gov(602) 926-3696

  7. Representative Jennifer Pawlik (jpawlik@azleg.gov(602) 926-3193

  8. Representative Nancy Gutierrez (ngutierrez@azleg.gov(602) 926-4134

  9. Representative Laura Terech (lterech@azleg.gov(602) 926-3894

  10. Representative Judy Schwiebert (jschwiebert@azleg.gov(602) 926-3390

Key points of HB2457 include:

  1. This bill would license certified anesthesiologist assistants (CAAs) and place no limit on their ratio of medical direction. 

  2. Unfortunately, as written, this bill is anti-competitive and would be very damaging for Arizona. Competition occurs both within and between the major professions.  Given the significant overlap in scope of practice, for the specialty of anesthesiology, allowing physicians to have an assistant without authorizing that same assistant for CRNAs gives a clear competitive advantage from the government, upsetting the robust competitive healthcare services market we have in Arizona.    

  3. It is damaging for Arizona healthcare system because CAAs are not eligible to be involved in CRNA clinical education (only CRNAs and physicians – recognized experts in anesthesiology – are authorized to do so).  As such, if a CAA is in an operating room providing care, a nurse anesthesia resident cannot be placed in that room – only compounding the shortage of clinical sites in Arizona. 

  4. Even though certified anesthesia assistants are essentially an unproven profession- compared to CRNAs and physician anesthesiologists- they are only able to practice in the highest-cost model (medical direction).

  5. Only allowing physicians to supervise CAAs will do nothing to alleviate the anesthesia shortage in rural and underserved communities where CRNAs are the primary and sometimes sole providers. 

It is important we stick to the facts when communicating with legislators. CRNAs are the solution to Arizona’s provider shortage- the facts are compelling enough!

If you would like to contribute to our continued legislative efforts, please click here.  If you are not a member of the AANA/AZANA, please click here to join us as we fight for all CRNAs in Arizona.

Let’s do this.  We must defeat this bill to protect your practice! 

Yours in service,

C. Reggie Elam, PhD, DNAP, CRNA
President
Arizona Association of Nurse Anesthesiology

SB1269 and HB2457 Update

AZANA Members:

Despite our best efforts- and certainly not without your support- SB1269 will not be proceeding out of committee this session.  We appreciate your time and effort in helping us remove unnecessary language, and in promoting the education and clinical training of our RRNAs.  This effort is not over, but for now, we must focus on bills still in committee that impact us directly.

HB2457, the bill permitting the licensure and practice of Certified Anesthesiologist Assistants (CAAs) in Arizona, is still very much alive.  The bill has now been transferred out of the House Regulatory Affairs committee and into the House Education Committee.  The bill’s sponsor, Representative Pingerelli, is the chair of this committee.  The bill is on the agenda for hearing on Tuesday, February 14, 2023.  

If you have not yet registered at azleg.gov for RTS (request to speak), please do so immediately.  Instructions for both mobile and desktop applications are attached.  Our lobbyists Kelsey Lundy and/or Jessie Armendt at Compass Strategies will activate your account at the Capitol.  If you have already registered and have been activated at the Capitol, please make sure you have voted ‘Against’ this legislation.  We must defeat this bill to protect your practice! 

In addition to RTS (RTS Mobile Instructions and RTS Desktop Instructions), we encourage you to reach out to members of the House Education Committee directly by email and phone, voicing your opposition to HB2457.  The members of the committee are: 

Key points of HB2457 include:

  1. This bill would license certified anesthesiologist assistants (CAAs) and place no limit on their ratio of medical direction. 

  2. Unfortunately, as written, this bill is anti-competitive and would be very damaging for Arizona. Competition occurs both within and between the major professions.  Given the significant overlap in scope of practice, for the specialty of anesthesiology, allowing physicians to have an assistant without authorizing that same assistant for CRNAs gives a clear competitive advantage from the government, upsetting the robust competitive healthcare services market we have in Arizona.    

  3. It is damaging for Arizona healthcare system because CAAs are not eligible to be involved in CRNA clinical education (only CRNAs and physicians – recognized experts in anesthesiology – are authorized to do so).  As such, if a CAA is in an operating room providing care, a nurse anesthesia resident cannot be placed in that room – only compounding the shortage of clinical sites in Arizona. 

  4. Even though certified anesthesia assistants are essentially an unproven profession- compared to CRNAs and physician anesthesiologists- they are only able to practice in the highest-cost model (medical direction).

  5. Only allowing physicians to supervise CAAs will do nothing to alleviate the anesthesia shortage in rural and underserved communities where CRNAs are the primary and sometimes sole providers. 

If you would like to contribute to our continued legislative efforts, please click here.  If you are not a member of the AANA/AZANA, please click here to join us as we fight for all CRNAs in Arizona. 

We understand how important your time is, and appreciate this uncertainty in a rapidly changing legislative session.  Know that we are here to support you, fight for all of you, and ensure the future of nurse anesthesiology practice in Arizona!

Yours in service,

C. Reggie Elam, PhD, DNAP, CRNA
President
Arizona Association of Nurse Anesthesiology

 

RRNA/NAR Designation Update

The terms Nurse Anesthesiology Resident (NAR) or Resident Registered Nurse Anesthesiologist (RRNA) are commonly used in nurse anesthesiology training programs and by clinical staff across the country. This prevalence led the Council on Accreditation (COA) to issue a position statement regarding the terminology that is included below. The COA supports each program determining the title that works best for them.

The AzANA Board of Directors discussed this issue and the use of Nurse Anesthesiology Resident (NAR) or Resident Registered Nurse Anesthesiologist (RRNA). In consultation with educators, clinicians, and other stakeholders the board concluded that based on the level of education being attained, status as licensed professionals prior to graduate school admission and years of critical care experience, they are completing a residency and the title should reflect this.

To that end, the AzANA Board of Directors acted to formally use the designation Registered Resident Nurse Anesthetist (RRNA) or Nurse Anesthesia Resident (NAR) when referencing RNs who are enrolled in an accredited nurse anesthesiology training program and in active pursuit of CRNA licensure.

Public Statement on Updated Nomenclature, Descriptors and Titles for CRNAs

Introduction: 

In recent years, it has become increasingly important that patients and other members of the public be fully informed as to who is administering the anesthetic and caring for patients while undergoing surgery. The AZANA desires patients and the public to be fully informed as to who takes responsibility for patients being administered anesthesia while undergoing surgery and for patients and the public to know that CRNAs provide expert-level anesthesiology services, are members of the nursing profession, and are distinct from their physician and dentist colleagues. 

 Anesthesiology has been the joint specialty of nursing, medicine, and dentistry, for over 100 years. CRNAs in Arizona and throughout the country have practiced independently during that time and offer expert-level anesthesia services to patients throughout the state, especially those in rural and underserved communities. 

 In recent years, to improve public understanding of these different professionals and expertise, updated terms such as “nurse anesthesiologist,” “physician anesthesiologist” and “dentist anesthesiologist” have become recognized by the accordant national professional and legal bodies. 

 Position:

AZANA endorses the following descriptors and titles to identify nurse anesthetists: “Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist,” “Certified Registered Nurse Anesthesiologist,” “CRNA,” “nurse anesthetist,” and “nurse anesthesiologist.”

 Arizona statute remains silent (i.e. does not specifically prohibit or authorize) on terms such as “nurse anesthesiologist,” “physician anesthesiologist” and “dentist anesthesiologist.”  As such, these terms of “descriptions” meant to enhance understanding for stakeholders, similar to terms such as “ER doctor” and “ER nurse,” which are also in common parlance but not specifically prohibited or authorized by the state of Arizona.

 Key Facts and Timeline: 

  • CRNAs begin their professional history of anesthesiology services in the civil war and in 1931, the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists is founded with a mission of advancing “the art and science of anesthesiology.”

  • Physician Anesthetists change their society from the “American Society of Anesthetists” to the “American Society of Anesthesiologists” in 1945. 

 These above historical facts demonstrate the precedent and history of antecedents (physician, nurse, dentist, etc) being used before a specialty (anesthesiology). 

 In recent years several key developments have supported updated and accurate terminology for anesthesiology professionals and assistants: 

  • The American Society of Anesthesiologists’ (ASA) research and highly notable adoption of the term “physician anesthesiologist” for their members since 2013.

  • 2013 American Society of Anesthesiologists’ research that 6/10 Americans did not associate the term “anesthesiologist” with “physician”, leading to their promotion of the term “physician anesthesiologist.”

  • The American Dentist Association’s (ADA) recognition of anesthesiology as a dental specialty and recognition of the “dentist anesthesiologist” in 2019

  • The recognition of “veterinary anesthesiologists” by American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia (ACVAA). 

  • The broad promotion and adoption of the term “anesthetist” by anesthesiology assistants. 

  • The international update from “anaesthestist” to “anaesthesiologist” by other major Western Societies for professionals who are recognized experts in anesthesiology.

  • The recognition of the term “nurse anesthesiologist” by the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA) since 2018. 

  • The August 2021 update of the AANA’s name to the “American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology.”

 Legal Developments:

1.  The recent legal precedent that “anesthesiologist” is a professional-neutral, legal term of art, unable to be patented by one profession, and its use by other professions is useful and non-misleading commercial free speech in advertising to the public which is constitutionally protected.

2.  Five (5) state Boards of Nursing (Arizona, Idaho, Alaska, Florida, and New Hampshire) have already recognized the nurse anesthesiologist. 

 Public Research Data:

Lastly, preliminary data has demonstrated the utility of “nurse anesthesiologist, ”demonstrating that the public clearly understandings the difference between “physician anesthesiologist” and “nurse anesthesiologist” and that “nurse anesthesiologist” is readily understood by the public to be a professional who is a member of the nursing profession and an expert in anesthesia services. 

 Conclusion: 

Using “Nurse Anesthesiologist” is an evidence-based communication tool that accurately describes CRNAs as members of the nursing profession as well as experts in anesthesiology services. It is consistent with the pattern(antecedent, specialty) established the by the two other major professions involved in anesthesiology as well as other nomenclature updates in anesthesiology.  

 As such, we endorse this term for our members to use with the public to avoid any potential confusion with other professionals so that the public is fully informed.